Despite a firm basis in science, body float is a very satisfying ‘dark art’ of slot car racing…

If my school had used slot cars to teach us physics, I reckon I’d remember a lot more. Body float is one of those slot car tweaks that is obviously based on sound scientific principles, but all I can tell you for sure is it works – making a slot car handle significantly better in corners and reducing lap times.

In this post, I’ll do my best to try and understand the science and then go through some steps to increase the body float on our test car, the Scalextric Ford Mustang GT4. We’ll see how much different the modification make to a two-minute test run on my Jadlam SL6 test track.

Why do we need Body Float?

In Part 2 – Tweaking a New Car, we looked at loosening the screws so the body is loose on the underpan. That’s basic ‘body float’.

Imagine you’re driving a full size road car and you turn a corner a little too quickly… The car will struggle to turn in and will start to tip a bit to the outside. The wheels on the inside will start to squeal, indicating they are lifting and losing grip. Inside the car, you’ll notice the driver and any passengers are tugged towards the outside of the corner – and it’s the same for any luggage or loose items.

What’s happening here is a type of inertia – a resistance to changing direction. We all know that when a slot car crashes in a corner it’s a combination of the car wanting to go straight on and it tipping over. We also know some cars crash more than others. Scalextric cars are nicely detailed scale models. However, that means their body shells are reasonably heavy and many cars have quite a high ‘centre of gravity’ – meaning more weight up top and more of a tendency to tip over going round corners. That weight is pulling the inside wheels up and off the track.

The standard traction magnets certainly help mask this effect, but there are three simple ways of overcoming that tipping…

  • Adding more weight down low in the underpan to lower the centre of gravity
  • Adding stronger traction magnets
  • Getting the body to ‘float’

Adding a little weight to the underpan can be useful to overall handling, as we’ve seen. However, the sort of weight required to lower the centre of gravity would make most cars pretty heavy! That means they’d struggle to slow down and to accelerate, certainly making cornering tricky and not necessarily reducing lap times. It is a similar problem with stronger magnets, there are some big disadvantages – especially lower top speed, overheating and reduced motor life.

Which leaves us with body float. The theory is that if the body is ‘floating’ a little, its weight is not transferred immediately to the underpan as the car enters a corner – which prevents the inside wheels lifting. Put another way, this lowers the effective centre of gravity and helps the car corner better – making the car less likely to tip, lose traction or fall over. As we’ve seen, the Mustang sits quite high and the body weighs in at 30g – over a third of the weight of the complete car. Getting some good body float should really help with the Mustang’s handling.

Simple Body Float – Loosening the screws

We already looked at this in Part 2 – Tweaking a New Car, but here’s a recap. Using a cross-head screwdriver, simply loosen each of the screws holding the body by one full turn anti-clockwise. For the Mustang, there are three screws – other cars may have four screws holding on the body. Before loosening, the body and underpan of the Mustang felt locked together. Afterwards, there’s some side-to-side movement, a rattling sound and a tiny gap opens up. This is all very good. Few Scalextric cars will give this degree of body float simply by loosening the screws, but it is worth doing in any case.

Did loosening the body screws help? Back in Part 2, I reported that there wasn’t a dramatic change to the feel of the car, but a two-minute test saw the Mustang improve by one lap and drop its best time by 0.39 seconds – which isn’t to be sniffed at.

A couple of final thoughts on screws…

  • loosening screws too much will cause them to drop out on the track. This is never good, but on a digital layout they are likely to cause a short circuit or ‘power overload’ warning if they end up in the slot. Adding a little tape over the screw holes will avoid any disasters should the screws fall out.
  • Upgrading the body screws to longer versions reduces the risk of the screws falling out. Using screws with no thread immediately under the head will improve body float a little. I’ll look at upgrades in the next part of this tuning series (Part 8 – Using Upgrade Parts). A similar effect can be gained by opening up the screw hole in the underpan a little.

Advanced Body Float – Sanding edges and cutting off lugs & braces

The aim of more advanced body float is to ‘de-couple’ the body from the underpan as much as possible. That usually means removing all tabs and braces that connect the body and the underpan, plus lightly sanding the edges (sides, front and rear) of the underpan so there is a gap of about one millimetre between the edges of the underpan and the body. These modifications should allow the body to move by 2-3 millimetres up-and-down, side-to-side, front-to-back, as well as tilting in three dimensions. The body should be loose and rattle nicely.

How well we can achieve this aim on a Scalextric car depends on the layout of the body and underpan – it’s quite straightforward on a car that has a simple flat chassis that only connects to the body via the screw posts. Once there are raised pieces (bumpers, valances, grilles, front and rear splitters etc) on the underpan that also connect to body, it does become difficult.

On our Mustang GT4, the underpan is wider and longer than the body – with the front splitter, side sills and rear diffuser all part of the underpan. That means sanding the edges of the underpan will not aid body float on this car. Loosening the screws did give us some decent body float, so it’s not a complete disaster.

Inside, there are braces on the interior that rest on the rear axle and motor – and another to a large tab on the right side of the underpan. Four small tabs on the underpan hold the body on the side sills and two tabs on the body hold the rear light board, plus one each for the two separate headlight boards. All these tabs and braces will be removed to cut the connection between body and underpan.

A sharp craft knife or scalpel is an important tool for such trimming – followed by light sanding. Do take care when you use a sharp knife – both of your fingers and of cutting things you don’t want to cut on the car. My Swann-Morton scalpel (a No3 handle with 10A blades) is one of my favourite tools and I do recommend adding one to your slot car toolbox.

There’s one final thing to look at – the body posts. On the Mustang, the three body posts (two front, one rear) sit on top of corresponding stubs on the underpan. These stubs have a small raised lip to hold the body post in place and will limit any side-to-side and front-to-back float. Those lips need to come off – either by sanding or trimming with a scalpel. If you are racing in a group or at a club that has rules, check you can do this. There may be a rule against lowering the car (ie trimming down body posts), but removing material from the underpan to aid body float may be acceptable. If in doubt, ask.

With these modifications complete, I was getting some nice side-to-side and up-and-down float, but not back-to-front. On close inspection, the rear light board sits very close to the body post and prevents backwards movement. Indeed, the wires have clearly got caught and squashed between the body post and underpan stub. You could simply remove the rear lights to free up the rear post. I don’t want to do that – and rear lights must be fitted and working for my club racing anyway – so I’ll accept it as another quirk of the Scalextric Mustang GT4.

Track Test – the final verdict

To test the impact of these body float modifications, the Mustang completed a couple of two minute runs on the SL6 test track. It drove like a dream – so predictable and smooth, with an occasional exciting power slide.  The best was a score of 27 laps and a best lap time of – you guessed it – 4.19 seconds.

There’s nothing wrong with the timing… me and the Mustang just seem to have reached peak performance over a two-minute test run. Don’t forget, I aim for a pace in those test runs where I’m completing 2 minutes without coming off – and 27 laps means an average of 4.44 seconds. If I put in some qualifying laps –  pushing really hard and not worrying about de-slots – then I’m getting down to 4.15 or  4.16 – and I even clocked 4.11 once. Being able to judge a pace, lap after lap, that is – on average – 0.33 seconds (8%) off my very quickest qualifying time is rather satisfying!


That’s pretty much as far as I’m going to go with tuning the Mustang’s standard parts. There are other things we could do – sanding out the inside of the body to reduce its weight; replace the interior with a lightweight lexan version; removing the lights; gluing the axle bushings; making the underpan more rigid, running in the motor and gears etc. I will look at a couple of these in the final part of the series.

Next time, I’ll fit some upgrade parts from and NSR to the Mustang – some of which I’ll carry over to Part 9, where I’ll show you a non-magnet set-up. That’s the version of the Mustang I’ll be racing at my Scalextric digital club. The final part will look at a few more preparations for racing the Mustang at the club and how to continue developing a race car at club events on much bigger circuits. You can find all ten parts here:

By Andy Player

Andy has been a big Scalextric fan from a very early age. He now runs the Worthing HO Racing club, is on the editorial team of SlotRacer Online and is a regular contributor to Slot Car Magazine.

2 thoughts on “Scalextric Tuning 7: Body Float”
  1. Yes but how do I solve the problem of buying a car with clown wheels ( eccentric ) on it,I’ve had to replace most the running gear on the last few Scalextric I’ve bought and I will no longer buy them they are cheap and badly built or designed .The ford falcons chassis is a joke where I raced .Why do Scalextric spend thousands to design a car that wont run.

    1. Thank you Dennis for your comment. I guess there are parts that need a bit of work and others that are simply not salvageable. Personally, I have rarely experienced problems with Scalextric models that a bit of sanding or a dab of glue can’t put right. Compared to performance brands like NSR and, Scalextric cars do need a lot of work to turn them into reliable non-mag racers. That’s because the different brands are aimed at very different markets. At my digital club, we mostly race Scalextric cars, tuned with many of the steps I’ve described in this series – usually with replacement tyres, but otherwise completely standard.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *